Header
| Sno | Hearing Date | Procceding |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19-10-2022 |
Shri Deepak Khurana, Counsel along with Shri Anil Sharma (both joined online) for petitioner.
Shri Vinay Kumar Jain (online), Counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent CSPDCL. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsel for respondent CSPTrCL. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The case is reserved for orders. |
| 2 | 28-04-2022 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Pranav Sood, Advocate along with Shri Pradeep Tandon and Shri Z. Ali for petitioner. 2. The petitioner informed that Honble APTEL has heard completed arguments in appeal Nos. 72 and 100 of 2016 and these appeals are reserved for orders. 3. Keeping in view the circumstances, with consent of petitioner the case be listed for hearing on 21.07.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 3 | 28-01-2022 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Pranav Sood, Advocate along with Shri Pradeep Tandon, Shri Axit Jain and Shri Z. Ali for petitioner. 2. The counsel of the petitioner has informed that final hearings of the appeals are yet to be heard. In present circumstances, the case may be fixed for hearing in the month of April. 3. As the matter related to this petition is pending before Honble APTEL and without decision of Honble APTEL, it would not be appropriate to decide this petition. 4. Keeping in view the above position with consent of the petitioner, the case be listed for hearing on 28.04.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 4 | 15-12-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Pranav Sood, Advocate along with Shri Pradeep Tandon, Shri Axit Jain and Shri Z. Ali for petitioner. 2. The petitioner prayed to decide the petition as the earliest as in absence of appropriate tariff the company facing financial difficulties. 3. The counsel of the petitioner has informed that final hearings of the appeals are likely to be heard in next month i.e. January 2022. 4. The Commission observed that the matter related to this petition is pending before Honble APTEL and without decision of Honble APTEL, it would not be appropriate to decide this petition. 5. Keeping in view the circumstances, the case be listed for hearing on 28.01.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 5 | 29-05-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Pranav Sood, Advocate along with Shri Pradeep Tandon, President, Shri Subodh Kumar Singh, Shri Axit Jain and Shri Z. Ali for petitioner. 2. Shri Sood requests for adjournment of hearing as appeals related to this matter are pending for hearing before Hon’ble APTEL, which is likely to be heard on 10/12/2021 and decision of appeals will widely impact the present petition. 3. Considering his request, we direct to list the case for hearing on 15/12/2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 6 | 05-02-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing. The Chairman of the Commission has also joined the hearing through video conferencing.
Shri Pradeep Tandon, President, Shri Pranav Sood, Shri Subodh Kumar Singh and Shri Hriday Bikash Das for petitioner. 2. Shri Sood requests for adjournment of hearing as appeals related to this matter are pending for hearing before Hon’ble APTEL, which is likely to be heard on 07.05.2021 and decision of appeals will widely impact the present petition. 3. Considering his request, we direct to list the case for hearing on 29.05.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 7 | 05-12-2020 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Pradeep Tandon, President, Shri Pranav Sood, Shri Subodh Kumar Singh, Shri Hriday Bikash Das and Axit Jain for petitioner. 2. Shri Sood requests for adjournment of hearing as appeals related to this matter are pending for hearing before Hon’ble APTEL, which is likely to be heard on 08.01.2021 and decision of appeals will widely impact the present petition. 3. Considering his request, we direct to list the case for hearing on 05.02.2021 at 3:30 PM. |
| 8 | 07-08-2020 |
Shri Pradeep Tandon, President, Shri Pranav Sood, Shri Subodh Kumar Singh and Shri Hriday Bikash Das for petitioner joined hearing through video conferencing.
2. Shri Sood requests for adjournment of hearing as appeals related to this matter are pending for hearing before Hon’ble APTEL, which is likely to be heard on 18.09.2020 and decision of appeals will widely impact the present petition. 3. Considering his request, we direct to list the case for hearing on 05.12.2020 at 3:30 PM. |
| 9 | 06-06-2020 | Commissions Order for Hearing on 07.08.2020 at 12:00 Noon. |
| 10 | 06-03-2020 |
Shri Z Ali, AGM for petitioner.
2. It is informed by the petitioner that the appeal before the Hon’ble APTEL has been fixed for hearing on 18.09.2020. The petitioner is directed to be present along with their counsel on the next date of hearing. 3. Case be listed on 05.05.2020 at 12:00 noon. |