Header
| Sno | Hearing Date | Procceding |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27-11-2021 |
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner.
Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel (through online) alongwith Shri Arvind Banerjee, SE for respondent CSPDCL. 2. In a recent development, the Honble APTEL pronounced judgment on dated 09/11/2021 in appeal nos. 113, 117, 118, 123, 137 and 138 of 2020 and set aside the order dated 17/06/2020 of Central Electricity Regulatory Commission revising the floor and forbearance price of solar and non-solar RECs at Rs. 0/MWh and Rs. 1000/MWh respectively. 3. After passing this order the obligated entities may purchase RECs from market and fulfill their RPO. The respondent is directed to purchase RECs for fulfillment of their RPO backlog by 25th February 2022 and intimate to CREDA (Nodal Agency). 4. The case is disposed off accordingly. |
| 2 | 28-08-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel (personally appeared Court room) alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel alongwith Shri Arvind Banerjee, SE for respondent CSPDCL. 2. The respondent seeks time for procurement of RECs. 3. We direct respondent to submit detailed plan for compliance of RPO (solar and non-solar) within one month with copy to petitioner. 4. The case be listed on 27.11.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 3 | 10-05-2021 |
The case was listed for hearing on 24.04.2021. Due to COVID -19 pandemic, complete lockdown was declared by the State Government in Raipur District w.e.f. 09.04.2021. Therefore, it was not possible to hear the case on scheduled date.
To be listed on 28.08.2021 at 11:30 AM for hearing. |
| 4 | 06-03-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel for respondent CSPDCL. 2. The respondent CSPDCL files additional submission today. 3. The case be listed for hearing on 24.04.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 5 | 12-02-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel for respondent CSPDCL. 2. The case was heard earlier by the bench consisting all three members. As the Chairman of the Commission is on leave, it would not be appropriate to hear the case in his absence. 3. The case be listed for hearing on 06.03.2021 at 3:30 PM. |
| 6 | 23-01-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Ms. Ritu Chauhan, Counsel for respondent CSPDCL. 2. Ms. Ritu Chouhan seeks adjournment as their arguing counsel Shri Vinay Kumar Jain is suffering from “CORONA”. Prayer allowed. 3. The case be listed for final hearing on 12.02.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 7 | 07-01-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
MS. Anushree Bardhan, Counsel along with Smt. S. Lakshmi Murthy for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, counsel for respondent No.1 CSPDCL. Shri S.K. Dhruw for respondent No.2 CEI. No one present for respondent No.3 NSPCL. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The parties want to file written submissions. They may file their submissions along with citations by 18th January 2021. 4. The case is reserved for orders. |
| 8 | 07-01-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
MS. Anushree Bardhan, Counsel along with Smt. S. Lakshmi Murthy for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, counsel for respondent No.1 CSPDCL. Shri S.K. Dhruw for respondent No.2 CEI. No one present for respondent No.3 NSPCL. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The parties want to file written submissions. They may file their submissions along with citations by 18th January 2021. 4. The case is reserved for orders. |
| 9 | 06-01-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel for respondent CSPDCL. 2. The CSPDCL prays for waiver of backlog RPO for the period from 2013-14 to 2018-19. Copy of the submissions provided to the opposite party. 3. The case be listed on 23.01.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 10 | 16-12-2020 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain, CE for petitioner. Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel alongwith Shri Arvind Banerjee, SE for respondent CSPDCL. 2. The respondent CSPDCL’s counsel seeks time for submission on this case. The respondent is directed to file his submission on affidavit within two weeks with copy to the opposite party. 3. The case be listed on 06.01.2021 at 3:30 PM. |
| 11 | 20-05-2020 | Commissions Order for Hearing on 16.12.2020 at 12:00 Noon. |
| 12 | 14-02-2020 |
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain,CE for petitioner.
Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel alongwith Shri Arvind Banerjee, SE for respondent. 2. It is informed by the parties that despite discussion at the level of Chief Engineers, no amicable solution could be found. We direct the parties to raise the level of participation and amicably resolve the matter before the next date of hearing. 3. The case be listed on 08.04.2020 at 12:00 noon. |
| 13 | 12-02-2020 |
Shri Apurv Goyal, Counsel alongwith Shri Sanjev Jain,CE for petitioner.
Shri Vinay Kumar Jain, Counsel for respondent. 2. The respondent submitted reply today. Copy given to the petitioner. 3. The respondent requested to hear the case on 14.02.2020 alongwith other similar matter. Request allowed. 4. The case be listed on 14.02.2020 at 12:00 noon. |