Header
| Sno | Hearing Date | Procceding |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-04-2022 |
Shri Raunak Jain, counsel with Shri Sunil Agrawal for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel with Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar and Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsels with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Heard the parties. 3. The parties want to file written submissions also. They may file their submissions by 11th April 2022. 4. The case is reserved for orders. |
| 2 | 28-02-2022 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Sunil Agrawal for petitioner. Shri Saurabh Jain, consel for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, counsel for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. The petitioner counsel Shri Raunak Jain, filed an application dated 25.02.2022 through email for adjournment of hearing as his an old case is listed for hearing on 28.02.2022. 3. Shri Abhinav Kardekar informed that Raipur Bar Association has called one-day strike on 28.02.2022, therefore he is unable to argue the case today. 4. Considering the requests made by the parties and keeping in view the present situation hearing of the case is adjourned. 5. With consent of the parties the case is fixed for hearing on 06.04.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 3 | 10-02-2022 |
The case is listed for hearing on Saturday 26/02/2022. In latter development, the Govt. of Chhattisgarh has declared five days week for working and all Saturdays and Sundays have been declared holidays. For the reason, it become necessary to rescheduled hearing for any other day.
2. Hence, list the case for hearing on 28/02/2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 4 | 06-01-2022 |
Hearing held through video conferencing. Chairman of the Commission is on tour and joined the hearing through video conferencing.
Shri Rounak Jain, Counsel for petitioner. Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel (physically present) along with Shri Promod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, Counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, SE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Heard the parties partially. It appears that physical presence and argument are required for better understanding of the case. Hence, the case is adjourned. 3. The case be listed for hearing on 26.02.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 5 | 14-12-2021 |
Shri Sunil Agrawal for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel along with Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE (through online) for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Smt. Meha Kumar, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL (through online). 2. The respondent counsel Shri Abhinav Kardekar informed through his application dated 13.12.2021 sent through email that a writ petition No. 4812 of 2021 was listed before the Honble High Court on 07.12.2021 and next date for argument has been fixed for 14.12.2021, on which , the counsel woluld has to appear physically before the Honble High Court of Chhattisgarh and therefore, he requested for adjournment of the hearing to be held today. 3. Other parties not objected his requests. Considering the circumstances, hearing of the case is adjourned. 4. With consent of the parties the case be listed for hearing on 06.01.2022 at 11:30 AM. |
| 6 | 27-10-2021 |
Shri Rounak Jain, counsel for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel along with Shri Promod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, SE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL (joined online). 2. In the course of hearing it is observed that the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent CSPDCL to release payment of fixed charges, which is not decided by the respondent yet. We direct the respondent CSPDCL to decide the representation by 10th December 2021 and apprise the Commission regarding their decision. 3. With consent of the parties the case is fixed for hearing on 14.12.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 7 | 07-10-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Rounak Jain, Counsel for petitioner. Shri Promod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, Counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, SE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Yesterday Shri Sourabh Jain, Counsel for respondent No. 1 has filed an application for adjournment of hearing for the reasons that he will be busy in final argument before the Honble High Court and therefore not be able to attend the hearing. Other parties not objected the prayer. Prayer allowed. 3. The case be listed for hearing on 27.10.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 8 | 30-07-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Raunak Jain, counsel along for petitioner. Shri Saurabh Jain, Counsel along with Shri G.K. Mandavi, SE and Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No.1 SLDC appeared physically in the court room. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. With consent of the parties the case be listed for final hearing on 07.10.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 9 | 15-06-2021 |
Hearing held through video conferencing.
Shri Raunak Jain counsel for petitioner. Shri Saurabh Jain, Counsel along with Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No.1 SLDC. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsels along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. The case is fixed today for final hearing. One of the Members of the Commission is going to retire next week. Further, selection of Chairman and Member is in process. Hence, in the present circumstances, it would be appropriate that the case be adjourned. 3. Accordingly, we direct to list the case for final hearing on 30.07.2021 at 11:30 AM. |
| 10 | 10-05-2021 |
The case listed for hearing on 03.04.2021 could not be heard as one of the officers if Legal Section tested positive for COVID 19 on the same day.
To be listed on 15.06.2021 at 11:30 AM for hearing. |
| 11 | 02-02-2021 |
Shri Raunak Jain counsel for petitioner.
Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No.1 SLDC. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Both parties pray for time for final hearing. Prayer allowed. 3. The case be listed for final hearing on 03.04.2021 at 3:30 PM. |
| 12 | 22-01-2021 |
Shri Raunak Jain counsel for petitioner.
Shri Pramod Bhaskar, EE for respondent No.1 SLDC. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Shri Saurabh Jain filed an application for adjournment of proceedings for the personal reason. Prayer allowed. 3. The case be listed for hearing on 02.02.2021 at 03:00 PM. |
| 13 | 09-12-2020 |
Shri Raunak Jain counsel for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Abhinav Kardekar, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Shri Abhinav Kardekar sought adjournment on health ground of his junior counsel. Othe do not have any objection. Prayer Allowed. 3. The case be listed for final hearing on 22.01.2021 at 03:30 PM. |
| 14 | 07-10-2020 |
The case was listed for hearing on 09.09.2020. Due to detection of Covid-19 cases in the office of the Commission, office was closed and, therefore, the case was adjourned.
3. The case be listed for hearing on 09.12.2020 at 03:30 PM. |
| 15 | 13-08-2020 |
The case was listed for 06.08.2020. Due to COVID-19 lockdown declared by the State Govt., hearing could not be held on the scheduled date.
2. The case be listed for hearing on 09.09.2020 at 3:30 PM. |
| 16 | 03-07-2020 |
Counsel of respondent No. 1 SLDC requested for adjournment on ground of personal difficulty.
2. Petitioner and respondent No.2 CSPDCL have no objection on the request. 3. With consent of the parties, hearing scheduled on 04.07.2020 is adjourned. 4. The case be listed for hearing on 06.08.2020 at 3:30 PM. |
| 17 | 02-06-2020 | Commissions Order for Hearing on 04.07.2020 at 12:00 Noon. |
| 18 | 13-03-2020 |
Shri Arun Poddar for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel along with Ms. Manju Patel, ALO for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Shri Sarvesh Khatnani, counsel along with Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. The petitioner’s counsel requested for adjournment through an application, as he could not be present for hearing today. The respondents did not object. Request accepted. 3. The petitioner is directed to submit rejoinder, if any, on or before 10.04.2020. The pleadings must be completed before 25.04.2020 positively. 4. The case be listed for final hearing on 02.05.2020 at 12:00 noon. |
| 19 | 08-01-2020 |
Shri Raunak Jain, Counsel for petitioner.
Shri Saurabh Jain, counsel along with Shri S. Bhaskaran, EE for respondent No. 1 SLDC. Ms. Gurpreet Kaur Chawla, counsel alongwith Shri Biplab Dutta, EE for respondent No. 2 CSPDCL. 2. Both counsels for respondents filed their vakalatnama. They sought four weeks’ time for filing of replies which is allowed. They must file their reply within four weeks with copy to the petitioner. 3. As prayed, the petitioner is allowed to file rejoinder, if any, within three weeks of filing of replies by the respondents with copy to opposite parties. 4. The parties must ensure completion of pleadings within the stipulated time given. 5. The case be listed for final hearing on 13.03.2020 at 12:00 noon. |